More police were killed in July than rioters

Recent developments have reignited fierce debate: as investigations into police killings during the protests gain momentum under the current BNP-led government, a wave of admissions, viral videos, and defensive statements from former student coordinators and allied figures has surfaced.

The core assertion in some quarters is that police suffered disproportionately high casualties—potentially more than protesters—in what is portrayed as orchestrated violence rather than spontaneous unrest. Muhammad Yunus himself admitted that it was not a spontaneous movement but meticulously designed.

Bangladesh Police reported 44 officers killed by the protesters from July 19 to August 5, 2024. Methods included savage beatings, hackings, slaughtering, hangings from bridges, burnings, and lynchings—even when officers tried to surrender or hide. The Canada-based Global Centre for Democratic Governance (GCDG), however, suggests the number may exceed this, with 187 officers still missing post-movement.

Even statements by the regime change actors are resurfacing to challenge the claim of 44 deaths.

A widely shared video features AB Party General Secretary Barrister Asaduzzaman Fuad claiming that “hundreds of police” were slaughtered with their encouragement.

In a DBC News talk show, Anti-Discrimination Student Movement (ADSM) Coordinator Hasib Al Islam stated that setting fire to the Metro Rail and killing police were necessary to achieve the “revolution” so swiftly.

Talks on police murder probe terrifying July anarchists

Police killer Mahdi questioned at Dhaka airport upon deportation from Delhi

GCDG report recalls police killings, release of militants in July-August 2024

Former Habiganj district coordinator Mahdi Hasan has admitted to burning police stations and setting fire to SI Santosh.

On January 3, ADSM President Rifat Rashid made explosive allegations at a Shahbagh program, implicating figures like Tarique Rahman, Jamaat Ameer Shafiqur Rahman, Hasnat Abdullah, Sarjis, and Nahid in July killings—and demanding electoral manifesto guarantees for their protection due to fears for his and others’ safety.

Earlier, leaders of the BNP and Bangladesh Khelafat Majlish admitted to having killed 15 police officers at the Enayetpur police station in Sirajganj.

These revelations have sparked alarm among leaders of the National Citizen Party (NCP), many of whom rose from the student movement. NCP Convener Nahid Islam has countered by insisting that “martyrs and injured fighters” receive justice first, warning of street action if not. NCP Chief Coordinator Nasiruddin Patwary has accused BNP of police killings during July.

Adding fuel to conspiracy theories, former Home Adviser Brig. Gen. (Retd.) Sakhawat Hossain told Channel One that he possesses photos showing individuals—whose physical build and appearance he claims do not resemble Bangladeshis—being transported by helicopter. He suggests the possible involvement of Pakistani snipers if investigated properly.

Enayetpur Police Massacre: Falsely blamed Awami League leader dies in jail

Will the new IGP ensure rule of law, try perpetrators of police murders?

Political analysts argue that the July-August events cannot be reduced to mere regime change. Violence against police, destruction of state property, and alleged premeditated escalation—using public anger as cover—may amount to sedition or serious crimes that cannot escape legal scrutiny. Some view the unrest as deliberately inflamed to achieve political ends.

With police and law enforcement reportedly reactivating unresolved July cases, intelligence sources indicate that top NCP figures could soon be named in probes. Observers warn that full-scale proceedings could trigger fresh political tensions in the coming weeks.

While the scale of police deaths (around 44 per official records) pales against the documented protester toll, the emerging focus on accountability for attacks on law enforcement highlights Bangladesh’s ongoing struggle to reconcile revolutionary zeal with the rule of law. As competing narratives clash, the demand for impartial, evidence-based justice—for all victims—remains urgent to prevent cycles of vengeance and instability.